Friday, April 4, 2014

Sea Level Rise, Environmental Justice, and The Windup Girl

          In the documentary The Island President, a news anchor at the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) asked Mohammed Nasheed, the president of the Maldives, if his country had any backup plan in the event that the climate negotiations in Copenhagen failed.  His response: “None.  We will die”.  Nasheed’s nation, the Maldives, encompasses roughly 2,000 small islands located in the Indian Ocean.  This developing country boasts a population of approximately 400,000 people, teems with oceanic biodiversity in the form of coral reefs, and maintains a robust tourism industry for the rich and famous.  The people of the Maldives have lived here for thousands of years in equilibrium with the ocean.  However, anthropogenic climate change has already begun to interrupt this peaceful equilibrium.  The Maldives average 4 feet and 11 inches above sea level.  Their highest point barely reaches 8 feet above sea level.  If the world does nothing to mitigate climate change, climate scientists have predicted that the resulting rise in sea levels will completely engulf the Maldives, destroying an entire national identity and creating hundreds of thousands of climate change refugees.  The plight of the Maldives begs the question of whether the wealthier, more powerful, high emissions countries that are contributing heavily to climate change are obligated to aid the Maldives and other less developed, poor island nations as they begin to feel the effects of climate change.

Paolo Bacigalupi’s The Windup Girl is set in 23rd century, post-climate change Thailand.  Sea level rise seems to be the most drastic change in the post climate-change world; while the rising sea has destroyed many developing nations, Thailand struggles to maintain itself with a system of levees and sea walls that use a pumping mechanism to pump the rising sea underground.  Developed nations and their “calorie corporations”, such as AgriGen and PurCal, have also exploited developing nations in this post-climate change world.  The developing nations like Thailand constantly struggle with new “genehacked” diseases, food shortages, and pests.   The book constantly alludes to a better life in the US and the fact that the US has a monopoly on the grain and rice market.  Even post-climate change, the global North has continued to exploit the global South instead of feeling the moral obligation to help them combat and adapt to climate change, disease, and agricultural pests.  The futuristic Thailand in the novel is also home to thousands of poorly-treated Chinese refugees, called “yellow cards”, that seem to have come into the country after being massacred in their own country (possibly for scarce resources).  This could be what happens to the citizens of the Maldives once their entire nation drowns under the rising ocean and they must ask other countries to take them in as climate change refugees.  More broadly, this exploitation and lack of moral concern for the global South mirrors Mohammed Nasheed’s situation in the Maldives.  Or better yet, it is the potential future of the global South post-climate change. 

The current real-life situation in the Maldives and the potential future that awaits the global South in The Windup Girl beg the question of what responsibilities the global North has to aid the global South, if any.  The global North is constantly blamed (and in my opinion, rightly so) for international environmental degradation, resource scarcity, and climate change.  As the creators of the problem and as the wealthier half of the world, many believe that the North is obligated to mitigate their emissions and aid nations such as the Maldives with climate change adaptation (infrastructure, clean water, etc).  Others may argue that in doing this, the North is imposing their will on the South and now allowing them to develop their economies and go through the same industrial process as the North did in the early 1900s.  Yet others may argue that the North has no obligation to help the South at all.  In my opinion, the North should be required to mitigate their emissions and aid the South not just with adaptation efforts, but with sustainable economic growth and focuses on things like research and development of clean energy and better infrastructure for public transport.  In this way, the North will be responsible for their emissions and will allow the South to have the opportunity to develop their economies, albeit in a more sustainable manner.  Hopefully, in this way, we can avoid the post-climate change future presented in The Windup Girl.

4 comments:

  1. Of course, it appears that after an initial setback, the global north (in the form of the calorie companies) were the 'winners', or at least the 'top losers' from the catastrophe that Bacigalupi talks about. If true, this presents a problem. How do you get the powerful to help out with a problem that poses only a small threat to them but a major threat to all others?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think your final point is very interesting in that I wonder if Anderson saw any obligation as a part of the global north to help the global south. However, I think what we see in The Windup Girl is an almost-totally-market-based economy, as discussed in class yesterday, where the economically powerful seem to have all of the power.

    But also just food for thought, I wonder what the US side of this story is. I think an interesting sequel to the book would give more detail on the calorie companies in the US and what the situation of the US is. Are they truly in paradise or no? This book left so many doors open for future sequels, maybe on purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was definitely really curious throughout the novel about what was happening in the rest of the world...although I guess that sticks with the theme of isolationism in the novel. How is it that after what is assumed to be some global environmental crisis that America still holds the upper hand?

    I think there is an interesting comparison to Anderson and his economic control over Thailand and the role that the global North has towards the global South. I think if the North has too much economic control over the South and influence in their devleop, we are looking at a world of economic corruption. It's bad enough when these small countries fall into corruption, but I think we'd be seeing world super-powers becoming even more power hungry, leading to corruption in some of the biggest eocnomic markets. I definitely think there is some obligation of the North to the South-- especially morally. Humans are humans and we are rare- we should be helping every human on the planet. We know that the current method of aid doesn't work--it eliminates the desire to innovate (at least according to Dambisa Moyo), so turning help into a business is the only way we might have hope--if the North and South truly become business partners. The problem is the won't be equals in the relationship. The North will always hold more power- physical, economic, etc., so the South will never be looking at a fair hand and we once again fall into corruption,

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that it is incredibly difficult to get the powerful to help out with a problem that barely effects them while it poses a huge threat to many others; the Maldives and other small island nations have been trying incredibly hard to get developed countries to take note of their plight and help them with adaptation and mitigation. What I think it comes down to is economic incentive and the obligation to help. If and when developed countries are incentivized or obligated under binding law to help these small island nations, then they will. Otherwise, I don't see much of a solution... unfortunately it's hard to convince developed countries that they should help others based solely on moral grounds.

    Katie, I think that's a really interesting idea about a sequel to the book! I was also really curious about what exactly was going on in the US while Anderson was in Thailand; we got snippets of their issues with pests but nothing about how well their citizens were faring. It does seem somewhat like Bacigalupi had the developed and developing nations playing a zero sum game where the developed nations were winning.

    ReplyDelete